Too soon?
-
Ya man. Mental health. Your boy Charlie was big in putting homeless people and transgenders in insane asylums.
@mechoman444 I would love to see some evidence that Charlie Kirk ever had one person admitted to an asylum. Show me one admittance form with his name on it. You might find some videos where he claimed those people were mentally ill. I believe he honestly felt that they were and had more concern for their mental well-being than you do.
I don’t believe that agreement and tolerance are always healthy. There are things we should stand against that society accepts. That isn’t hate. #lie
-
@surph_ninja What kind of a person makes unqualified accusations against a dead man without providing any proof? And then we asked about evidence, dismisses the need to validate claims against someone’s character?
You are a bitter, hateful person and from what I see you are much closer to the type of person you claim Charlie was than he has ever been. I pity you. I honestly feel bad for you.
You’re a white supremacist. Your kind is a disease on this planet.
-
You’re a white supremacist. Your kind is a disease on this planet.
@surph_ninja LOL. Since you don't know me, you have no idea how absurd that statement is. All you know is that I am white. If that is your idea of a white supremacist, then God help us all.
Resorting to name-calling doesn't support your case. I would like to say it has been a pleasure chatting, but that would be dishonest. I truly wish you were up the challenge of a real conversation.
The real disease on this planet is something called sin. I am definitely part of the problem. We all are.
-
That’s what a strawman is, dumbass.
A hypothetical is not a straw man.
By virtue of you not addressing my two hypotheticals, I have now decided that you would respond to the nuking of California by Trump with both Biden and Trump are the same. Which is an insane position to have, which is probably why you're not answering the hypotheticals in the first place. Because you know it's insane, and yet you still hold that position.
I noticed you also dodged my question about policy versus outcomes.
It's pretty clear that you don't care and you're just a troll or an idiot.
You'd be doing everyone a favor, scratch that, possibly saving some lives, by getting your jollies off on trolling something other than politics.
I see no further reason to reply on this thread.
Have a nice life.
-
A hypothetical is not a straw man.
By virtue of you not addressing my two hypotheticals, I have now decided that you would respond to the nuking of California by Trump with both Biden and Trump are the same. Which is an insane position to have, which is probably why you're not answering the hypotheticals in the first place. Because you know it's insane, and yet you still hold that position.
I noticed you also dodged my question about policy versus outcomes.
It's pretty clear that you don't care and you're just a troll or an idiot.
You'd be doing everyone a favor, scratch that, possibly saving some lives, by getting your jollies off on trolling something other than politics.
I see no further reason to reply on this thread.
Have a nice life.
Hahaha. Applying for Kirk’s old job? This must be satire.
-
@surph_ninja LOL. Since you don't know me, you have no idea how absurd that statement is. All you know is that I am white. If that is your idea of a white supremacist, then God help us all.
Resorting to name-calling doesn't support your case. I would like to say it has been a pleasure chatting, but that would be dishonest. I truly wish you were up the challenge of a real conversation.
The real disease on this planet is something called sin. I am definitely part of the problem. We all are.
If you defend Nazis, you’re a Nazi. If you defend white supremacists, you’re a white supremacist. Pretty simple.
-
If you defend Nazis, you’re a Nazi. If you defend white supremacists, you’re a white supremacist. Pretty simple.
@surph_ninja You can label me and anybody else whatever you want. When you don't provide any justification for your slander other than anecdotes and regurgitation of propaganda...
Nevermind, this conversation thread is boring me now. I might as well be talking to my toaster oven. God bless. #uncivildiscourse #timewasted #propaganda #Godhelpus
-
Nonviolent resistance movements are more likely to facilitate transitions from autocracy to democracy, improve democratic qualities like civil liberties, transform security forces and judicial systems in rights-respecting directions, and enhance well-being measures such as life expectancy.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2452292924000365
The commonly held belief that most revolutions that have happened in dictatorial regimes were bloody or violent uprisings is not borne out by historical analysis.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonviolent_revolution
Empirical evidence strongly favors strategic, organized nonviolent resistance as the most effective path to sustainable political change.
Political assassinations are a tool of desperation. They're effective at creating instability and further violence; counterproductive for achieving lasting political goals. They fail to eliminate the ideas, movements, and structures that person represented.
Those nonviolent movements didn't exist in a vaccuum, and dismissing the violence that WAS present as wholly separate and due no credit is IGNORING HISTORY.
-
@mechoman444 I would love to see some evidence that Charlie Kirk ever had one person admitted to an asylum. Show me one admittance form with his name on it. You might find some videos where he claimed those people were mentally ill. I believe he honestly felt that they were and had more concern for their mental well-being than you do.
I don’t believe that agreement and tolerance are always healthy. There are things we should stand against that society accepts. That isn’t hate. #lie
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Your prose comes across as deliberately nice and tolerant, but that only highlights how shaky your stance is. You frame "tolerance" as though it excuses supporting Charlie Kirk. It doesn't. Using tolerance to shield a bigot and a racist is not a virtue, it's complicity.
Opposing Kirk's rhetoric isn't hatred. It's simply refusing to let prejudice masquerade as principle.
Also, to be clear I never ment that charlie Kirk ever admitted or had someone committed to a facility. But he is on record saying that homeless people and transgenders should all be committed to mental health facilities.
-
Your prose comes across as deliberately nice and tolerant, but that only highlights how shaky your stance is. You frame "tolerance" as though it excuses supporting Charlie Kirk. It doesn't. Using tolerance to shield a bigot and a racist is not a virtue, it's complicity.
Opposing Kirk's rhetoric isn't hatred. It's simply refusing to let prejudice masquerade as principle.
Also, to be clear I never ment that charlie Kirk ever admitted or had someone committed to a facility. But he is on record saying that homeless people and transgenders should all be committed to mental health facilities.
@mechoman444 If he is "on record" with statements about committing people to institutions, please share some links and I will be happy to read them. I might agree or disagree depending on the information provided.
My "prose" is just the way I speak. I don't care if you find me tolerant or not. Tolerance is not something I strive for, nor is hatred or bigotry.
I would submit that Kirk's commentary and opinions are no more hatred and vitriol than your own. You are just on opposite sides. #truth
-
@mechoman444 If he is "on record" with statements about committing people to institutions, please share some links and I will be happy to read them. I might agree or disagree depending on the information provided.
My "prose" is just the way I speak. I don't care if you find me tolerant or not. Tolerance is not something I strive for, nor is hatred or bigotry.
I would submit that Kirk's commentary and opinions are no more hatred and vitriol than your own. You are just on opposite sides. #truth
@luyapapi If you come to this conclusion, you have to be very close to the Nazis.
Charlie Kirks ideology was way more hateful and anti-human.
You are a thinly veiled troll. #truth
Your faked civility in writing would be something to compliment, but we live in the age of chatbots, so it's questionable if these skills are yours. -
@luyapapi If you come to this conclusion, you have to be very close to the Nazis.
Charlie Kirks ideology was way more hateful and anti-human.
You are a thinly veiled troll. #truth
Your faked civility in writing would be something to compliment, but we live in the age of chatbots, so it's questionable if these skills are yours.@DerGiga @mechoman444 If you people understood how silly it sounded to competent people for you to compare someone like Charlie Kirk to the Nazi regime...It would be comical if it wasn't so disturbing. What you don't understand is that your hyperbole undermines your position.
You are trying so hard to vilify people that you go to the furthest extreme of inhumanity instead of comparing them to less evil people. It is such a jump that it makes me laugh. You would be more effective with less.
-
Can't tell if joke
Its a joke, mocking the bluanon belief that Trump staged his own assassination attempt.
-
@surph_ninja You can label me and anybody else whatever you want. When you don't provide any justification for your slander other than anecdotes and regurgitation of propaganda...
Nevermind, this conversation thread is boring me now. I might as well be talking to my toaster oven. God bless. #uncivildiscourse #timewasted #propaganda #Godhelpus
I haven’t. You labeled yourself a white supremacist by association.
-
I haven’t. You labeled yourself a white supremacist by association.
@surph_ninja The reality is that I love you as a human and an image-bearer of the Creator, God. I don't know you, but I know who made you. You and I are both imperfect people in a fallen world. Genesis 1:27-28 says God made us in His image. He made us male and female. Two distinct sexes. Two legitimate genders.
Romans 1:27 and verses in Leviticus speak to the abomination of homosexuality.
Because I believe the Bible I speak against these sinful acts...Not due to hate. Love != approval. #truth
-
@mechoman444 If he is "on record" with statements about committing people to institutions, please share some links and I will be happy to read them. I might agree or disagree depending on the information provided.
My "prose" is just the way I speak. I don't care if you find me tolerant or not. Tolerance is not something I strive for, nor is hatred or bigotry.
I would submit that Kirk's commentary and opinions are no more hatred and vitriol than your own. You are just on opposite sides. #truth
I'm not here to hand you evidence or play research assistant. I'm responding because your own tone was condescending and I'm not going to let it stand unchallenged.
Charlie Kirk was a bigot and a racist. That is not an opinion but a matter of record. His rhetoric makes it obvious and your defense of him makes your position clear.
If you think I was calling you tolerant or care if you are tolerant or not you completely miss the point of what I was trying to say.
-
I'm not here to hand you evidence or play research assistant. I'm responding because your own tone was condescending and I'm not going to let it stand unchallenged.
Charlie Kirk was a bigot and a racist. That is not an opinion but a matter of record. His rhetoric makes it obvious and your defense of him makes your position clear.
If you think I was calling you tolerant or care if you are tolerant or not you completely miss the point of what I was trying to say.
@mechoman444 I'm not looking for a research assistant. It just seems fair that you provide evidence for claims against someone's character. Shows that you have none. Go figure.
You call anyone whatever names you like. It doesn't make them true, even if many voices agree with you. I am glad my position is clear. In case it isn't, I am stating that you are in fact, the very things you claim Charlie to have been.
And again, I couldn't care less what you think of me. It's been lovely talking to u
-
@DerGiga @mechoman444 If you people understood how silly it sounded to competent people for you to compare someone like Charlie Kirk to the Nazi regime...It would be comical if it wasn't so disturbing. What you don't understand is that your hyperbole undermines your position.
You are trying so hard to vilify people that you go to the furthest extreme of inhumanity instead of comparing them to less evil people. It is such a jump that it makes me laugh. You would be more effective with less.
I'm assuming you're the competent one.
Believe it or not it's really hard to get people to compare another person to a Nazi you really have to jump some hurdles to do that.
For example Thomas Midgley, Jr. (Look him up) Is probably one of the worst human beings ever produced by our species and yet nobody really compares him to Nazis.
On the other hand there is nothing more universally compared to Nazis than our current sitting president his rhetoric and the people that support him including your boy Charlie.
-
I'm assuming you're the competent one.
Believe it or not it's really hard to get people to compare another person to a Nazi you really have to jump some hurdles to do that.
For example Thomas Midgley, Jr. (Look him up) Is probably one of the worst human beings ever produced by our species and yet nobody really compares him to Nazis.
On the other hand there is nothing more universally compared to Nazis than our current sitting president his rhetoric and the people that support him including your boy Charlie.
@mechoman444 I'd like to think we are both competent. You are just blinded by your hatred and bigotry against conservatives. But I guess it is acceptable when it happens on your side.
Liberals jump to the "Nazi" term very quickly. You are just mistaken about that.
-
@mechoman444 I'm not looking for a research assistant. It just seems fair that you provide evidence for claims against someone's character. Shows that you have none. Go figure.
You call anyone whatever names you like. It doesn't make them true, even if many voices agree with you. I am glad my position is clear. In case it isn't, I am stating that you are in fact, the very things you claim Charlie to have been.
And again, I couldn't care less what you think of me. It's been lovely talking to u
You've got to be a bot. Seriously.
