If Musk succeeds in "repealing all regulation", what's the best strategy for a normal person? Unethical answers only.

[shotgun_alice@lemmy.world]

Using his house/property as a hazardous chemicals dumping site.

[klemptor@startrek.website]

Such a good book

[klemptor@startrek.website]

Call the BeeGees?

[hirom@beehaw.org]

Like how Stephen Colbert setup his own SuperPac on air, showing how many ridiculous and unethical things are legal with US' current campaign finance laws.

[kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de]

Fair point, but without regulations your claims can be way wilder, and you don't have to make stuff safe to ingest anymore. Overall I think quackery can become even more profitable.

[rando895@lemmygrad.ml]

So your solution is to sow more division by believing people who vote Republican are stupid? The same people who believe you are stupid for voting Democrat (or anyone else)? Interesting....

Maybe target the real problem: the system and the people who uphold it. Otherwise you are just a pawn of the wealthy.

[soapbox1858@lemm.ee]

It's cute that you think anyone but the richest people and biggest corporations will be deregulated.

[crabandbroom@lemmy.ml]

I mean realistically what are you gonna do, appeal to their better nature? We've been trying to do that since when... Reagan? Nixon? The right has only dug in deeper and deeper, and now the Nazis are back.

We're long overdue for some fuck about and find out time IMO.

[junkers_klunker@lemmy.world]

Fair enough, just have been banned before for writing kill

[cowbee@lemmy.ml]

Likely not on Lemmy.ml, different admins and mods.

[otp@sh.itjust.works]

I'm not some anti-censorship SovCit nut or anything...but any platform that doesn't let me say "kill" is not a platform I want to be on.

Hell...suicide, abortion, murder, rape...we need to talk about these things sometimes. If users want to opt-in to trigger word filters, by all means. It should be up to the user if "Rape" and "Musk" are in the same category and shouldn't show up on their screens.

[junkers_klunker@lemmy.world]

Which is why I wrote technically, I don’t disagree that we’re better of without certain people.

[djdarren@thelemmy.club]

OP said "unethical answers only".

[umbrella@lemmy.ml]

reminder that killing ceos is great and all but it wont make systemic change.

[glitterbomb@lemmy.world]

You're right. CEOs are often times at board meetings with the whole C level and shareholders.

One big general airstr-

Oh you're talking about angry signs and picketing outside? Nevermind

[alice@beehaw.org]

I work for a big corp that already ignores their own regulations I'll start opening products, pissing in them, and putting them back on the shelf. It won't help anything but I'll personally enjoy it

[ultragigagigantic@lemmy.ml]

All drugs should be legal

[rbwells@lemmy.world]

Run for office?

[dx1@lemmy.ml]

Yup, this is classic "we'll abolish the EPA but your 8 year old still is forbidden from running a lemonade stand."

[some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org]

I think maybe I'll just open an online shop that sells everything that's illegal. Only I won't ship anything and I'll keep all the money for myself. It won't take long for that to catch up to me, but it'll be fun for about five minutes.