Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Funny
  3. Wait... what?

Wait... what?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Funny
funny
33 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • mannycalavera@feddit.ukM [email protected]

    I mean... 1066 was also the Battle of Hastings and the Norman conquest of England 🤷. Maybe it's deep wine satire implying the French can't count?

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    https://youtu.be/bQ8A5gRe_Dw

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
      This post did not contain any content.
      redsnt@feddit.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
      redsnt@feddit.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
      #7

      They still haven't "fixed" it btw. And my human meat brain is 99% certain it's on purpose:

      18 - 5 = 12
      and
      264 * 3 = 782

      ::: spoiler Bonus math problems.

      :::

      fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF A 2 Replies Last reply
      20
      • mannycalavera@feddit.ukM [email protected]

        I mean... 1066 was also the Battle of Hastings and the Norman conquest of England 🤷. Maybe it's deep wine satire implying the French can't count?

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        It's Spanish wine though

        Q 1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • S [email protected]

          Its probably wrong on purpose, as engagement bait

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          engagement bait

          That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?

          heathcliff@lemm.eeH T 2 Replies Last reply
          31
          • B [email protected]

            It's Spanish wine though

            Q This user is from outside of this forum
            Q This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            i suspect the explanation for the bad math is on the back.

            E 1 Reply Last reply
            2
            • M [email protected]

              engagement bait

              That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?

              heathcliff@lemm.eeH This user is from outside of this forum
              heathcliff@lemm.eeH This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              The engagement bait is on them!

              1 Reply Last reply
              17
              • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Drink first, ask questions later.

                1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • redsnt@feddit.dkR [email protected]

                  They still haven't "fixed" it btw. And my human meat brain is 99% certain it's on purpose:

                  18 - 5 = 12
                  and
                  264 * 3 = 782

                  ::: spoiler Bonus math problems.

                  :::

                  fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                  fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

                  E redsnt@feddit.dkR 2 Replies Last reply
                  3
                  • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                    dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    Putting the shitty drunk math aside, what’s the significance of all of the numbers?

                    K 1 Reply Last reply
                    16
                    • Q [email protected]

                      i suspect the explanation for the bad math is on the back.

                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      E This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      Naw, it's inside on the bottom.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      3
                      • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        E This user is from outside of this forum
                        E This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        If you can't even do basic math on the label, then how can I trust you to have not fucked up the actual product? I'll stick to whiskey.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        4
                        • fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                          2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          E This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          Theyre all wrong intentionally.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          17
                          • fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                            2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

                            redsnt@feddit.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
                            redsnt@feddit.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                            #18

                            Whoops. Not that it mattered much as [@[email protected] pointed out, but thanks for correcting me nonetheless.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • mannycalavera@feddit.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                              mannycalavera@feddit.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              Hey it's wine satire. It doesn't need to make sense.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                I think the joke is this wine will get you too drunk to do math right

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                6
                                • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

                                  Putting the shitty drunk math aside, what’s the significance of all of the numbers?

                                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  K This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Battle of Hastings 1066, birth of Charlemagne 748. Not sure on the other two, events don't seem like they could be linked in the same way as far as years go but it could be something else.

                                  dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD lemmy_2019@lemmy.oneL 2 Replies Last reply
                                  15
                                  • M [email protected]

                                    engagement bait

                                    That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?

                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    T This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    It's an ad

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    11
                                    • K [email protected]

                                      Battle of Hastings 1066, birth of Charlemagne 748. Not sure on the other two, events don't seem like they could be linked in the same way as far as years go but it could be something else.

                                      dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      Maybe our resident historian, @[email protected], might have a clue?

                                      pugjesus@lemmy.worldP 1 Reply Last reply
                                      9
                                      • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

                                        Maybe our resident historian, @[email protected], might have a clue?

                                        pugjesus@lemmy.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        pugjesus@lemmy.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        Got me, I'm afraid!

                                        dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD 1 Reply Last reply
                                        10
                                        • pugjesus@lemmy.worldP [email protected]

                                          Got me, I'm afraid!

                                          dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          Damnit. You were our only hope!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          15
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups