Wait... what?
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Off by 100.
"Correcto" my ass. This is wrongo.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This is why you should make the label before drinking the wine
-
This post did not contain any content.
Its probably wrong on purpose, as engagement bait
-
This post did not contain any content.
I mean... 1066 was also the Battle of Hastings and the Norman conquest of England
. Maybe it's deep wine satire implying the French can't count? -
I mean... 1066 was also the Battle of Hastings and the Norman conquest of England
. Maybe it's deep wine satire implying the French can't count? -
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
They still haven't "fixed" it btw. And my human meat brain is 99% certain it's on purpose:
18 - 5 = 12
and
264 * 3 = 782::: spoiler Bonus math problems.
::: -
I mean... 1066 was also the Battle of Hastings and the Norman conquest of England
. Maybe it's deep wine satire implying the French can't count?It's Spanish wine though
-
Its probably wrong on purpose, as engagement bait
engagement bait
That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?
-
It's Spanish wine though
i suspect the explanation for the bad math is on the back.
-
engagement bait
That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?
The engagement bait is on them!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Drink first, ask questions later.
-
They still haven't "fixed" it btw. And my human meat brain is 99% certain it's on purpose:
18 - 5 = 12
and
264 * 3 = 782::: spoiler Bonus math problems.
:::2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Putting the shitty drunk math aside, what’s the significance of all of the numbers?
-
i suspect the explanation for the bad math is on the back.
Naw, it's inside on the bottom.
-
This post did not contain any content.
If you can't even do basic math on the label, then how can I trust you to have not fucked up the actual product? I'll stick to whiskey.
-
2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.
Theyre all wrong intentionally.
-
2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Whoops. Not that it mattered much as [@[email protected] pointed out, but thanks for correcting me nonetheless.
-
Hey it's wine satire. It doesn't need to make sense.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I think the joke is this wine will get you too drunk to do math right
