Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Funny
  3. Wait... what?

Wait... what?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Funny
funny
33 Posts 28 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B [email protected]

    It's Spanish wine though

    Q This user is from outside of this forum
    Q This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #10

    i suspect the explanation for the bad math is on the back.

    E 1 Reply Last reply
    2
    • M [email protected]

      engagement bait

      That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?

      heathcliff@lemm.eeH This user is from outside of this forum
      heathcliff@lemm.eeH This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #11

      The engagement bait is on them!

      1 Reply Last reply
      17
      • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        I This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #12

        Drink first, ask questions later.

        1 Reply Last reply
        3
        • redsnt@feddit.dkR [email protected]

          They still haven't "fixed" it btw. And my human meat brain is 99% certain it's on purpose:

          18 - 5 = 12
          and
          264 * 3 = 782

          ::: spoiler Bonus math problems.

          :::

          fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
          fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #13

          2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

          E redsnt@feddit.dkR 2 Replies Last reply
          3
          • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
            dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #14

            Putting the shitty drunk math aside, what’s the significance of all of the numbers?

            K 1 Reply Last reply
            16
            • Q [email protected]

              i suspect the explanation for the bad math is on the back.

              E This user is from outside of this forum
              E This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #15

              Naw, it's inside on the bottom.

              1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                E This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #16

                If you can't even do basic math on the label, then how can I trust you to have not fucked up the actual product? I'll stick to whiskey.

                1 Reply Last reply
                4
                • fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                  2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #17

                  Theyre all wrong intentionally.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  17
                  • fuckfuckmyfuckingass@lemmy.worldF [email protected]

                    2nd one is 18-5 not 2. Looks like in the initial equation they forgot to carry the one, probably because it'd make the label look stupider than it already is.

                    redsnt@feddit.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
                    redsnt@feddit.dkR This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                    #18

                    Whoops. Not that it mattered much as [@[email protected] pointed out, but thanks for correcting me nonetheless.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • mannycalavera@feddit.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                      mannycalavera@feddit.ukM This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #19

                      Hey it's wine satire. It doesn't need to make sense.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #20

                        I think the joke is this wine will get you too drunk to do math right

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        6
                        • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

                          Putting the shitty drunk math aside, what’s the significance of all of the numbers?

                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #21

                          Battle of Hastings 1066, birth of Charlemagne 748. Not sure on the other two, events don't seem like they could be linked in the same way as far as years go but it could be something else.

                          dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD lemmy_2019@lemmy.oneL 2 Replies Last reply
                          15
                          • M [email protected]

                            engagement bait

                            That's what we are calling jokes nowadays?

                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            T This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #22

                            It's an ad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            11
                            • K [email protected]

                              Battle of Hastings 1066, birth of Charlemagne 748. Not sure on the other two, events don't seem like they could be linked in the same way as far as years go but it could be something else.

                              dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                              dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #23

                              Maybe our resident historian, @[email protected], might have a clue?

                              pugjesus@lemmy.worldP 1 Reply Last reply
                              9
                              • dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

                                Maybe our resident historian, @[email protected], might have a clue?

                                pugjesus@lemmy.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                                pugjesus@lemmy.worldP This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #24

                                Got me, I'm afraid!

                                dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD 1 Reply Last reply
                                10
                                • pugjesus@lemmy.worldP [email protected]

                                  Got me, I'm afraid!

                                  dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  dohpaz42@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #25

                                  Damnit. You were our only hope!

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  15
                                  • kolanaki@pawb.socialK [email protected]

                                    Off by 100.

                                    "Correcto" my ass. This is wrongo.

                                    vicksvaporbbqrub@sh.itjust.worksV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    vicksvaporbbqrub@sh.itjust.worksV This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                    #26

                                    Wrongo is a 2020 red varietal that pairs well with fresh astrophysics.

                                    https://www.winesellersltd.com/wine_asset/wrongo-dongo-monastrell/

                                    O 1 Reply Last reply
                                    12
                                    • stamets@lemmy.worldS [email protected]
                                      This post did not contain any content.
                                      captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.worksC This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #27

                                      are they trying to say the whole is less than the sum of its parts?

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • redsnt@feddit.dkR [email protected]

                                        They still haven't "fixed" it btw. And my human meat brain is 99% certain it's on purpose:

                                        18 - 5 = 12
                                        and
                                        264 * 3 = 782

                                        ::: spoiler Bonus math problems.

                                        :::

                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #28

                                        they are all off by 100, 1, and 10 respectfully; so we can say it was deliberate for whatever their reasoning may be.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • K [email protected]

                                          Battle of Hastings 1066, birth of Charlemagne 748. Not sure on the other two, events don't seem like they could be linked in the same way as far as years go but it could be something else.

                                          lemmy_2019@lemmy.oneL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          lemmy_2019@lemmy.oneL This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #29

                                          1166 was the birth of King John, for what it's worth.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups