JavaScript
-
I know nothing about javascript, what is wrong with using + for math? perhaps naively, I'd say it looks suited for the job
wrote on last edited by [email protected]The native arithmetic operators are prone to floating point rounding errors
-
So all you've mustered is some lame-ass ad-hominem? Have a good day
No, it just so happens I have a minute to talk about our lord and saviour JS. What is His holy and sacred mission?
-
This here is my absolute favorits way to diss someone. Send the a wikipeda link and bam!
-
No, it just so happens I have a minute to talk about our lord and saviour JS. What is His holy and sacred mission?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Ah, you're a troll. I see. Blocked.
-
Ah, you're a troll. I see. Blocked.
You asked for it, smart ass
-
That is just the tip of the iceberg:
so plus coerces into string if not number, was that so hard?
-
This has got to be baNaNa
-
It makes sense though
It does to some degree.
- "11" is string, 1 is an int, because strings can be added (+) convert int to string and combine: "11"+"1" = "111"
- "11" is string, 1 is an int, because strings cant be subtracted (-) convert string to int and combine: 11-1 = 10
I'm not into JS so I don't know how it takes priority. ints can be added too, so I guess its basing it on the first variable which is compatible with the operator: in the first case string, in the second case int.
If this is how it works, it makes sense. But imo its a case of the designers being preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What no type safety does to an MF...
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
javascript is to web developers what powerpoint is to sales people
-
This here is my absolute favorits way to diss someone. Send the a wikipeda link and bam!
