Brazilian court gives Apple 90 days to allow sideloading on iOS.

[fundmecfsresearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

There are ways without the dev account (faked certificate), but if you use a VPN, or update your Os, apple will blacklist your device. And you also need to have some very specific DNS settings blocking a bunch of apple domains. @avieshek@lemmy.world is an expert.

[johnedwa@sopuli.xyz]

Sideloading (is supposed to) mean just transferring files between local devices, as in, you aren't uploading or downloading them, you are going sideways. E.g you download a song to your pc, then sideload it to your mp3 player.

That's also where it comes to installing phone apps, as you transfer the app file to the phone yourself.

[helpimtrappedonline@lemmy.world]

That's the whole point, to force iPhone to also have freedom.

Android is becoming less free every year; the more Apple gets away with, the closer Android/Google will drift towards it.

[tuxman@sh.itjust.works]

Ok, but what about game consoles? I don’t like how Nintendo is abusing their dominant position in the software distribution for the Switch.

[powermaker450@discuss.tchncs.de]

then don't.

it's not something your being forced to do. it's the lifting of an unnecessary restriction that in turn gives you more power on your device.

[winterfrost@lemm.ee]

Freedom comes with a cost. I'm sure Apple will find a way to earn big bucks from this sideloading of app thing.

[winterfrost@lemm.ee]

iOS is so closed source I don't think Apple is gonna give us that freedom!!

[constantpain@lemmy.world]

This will not fly here. It' will be considered "bad faith" and will incur in penalties.

They'll probably try tho, CADE will protest and the judge will make an adjustment to the rulling.

[winterfrost@lemm.ee]

I remember jailbreaking used to be a thing on iPhone then Apple slowly integrated the jailbreak features into iPhone. Then slowly jailbreaking died, I mean not literally dead but people are now unfamiliar with that thing.

[balder1991@lemmy.world]

Like this?

[arkthos@pawb.social]

If they don't then they might lose the Brazilian market and who knows what comes after. It's less about what Apple wants to do and more about what they might be forced to do.

[hanrahan@slrpnk.net]

Yeah, i went Steam in stead, Nintendo makes my skin crawl with disgust.

[winterfrost@lemm.ee]

They'll comply for sure but at what cost, that's the thing to watch.

[hanrahan@slrpnk.net]

Enshittification is subtle and started long before we realized.

No it didn't , lot of folks have been banging on about it for decades.

Like privacy, most peole dont give a shit until it's too late and then say but no body said anything.

I've been screaming into the void from the mid '90s.

[prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

This is how brain-broken capitalism has made people... The concept of an effective government actually regulating a company and forcing them to spend more money to do the thing they should be doing is just completely foreign to you.

[prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone]

What's the problem? Should those features only be available to people who know about jailbreaking? It seems like the pressure caused Apple to actually spend some money to add useful features that people obviously wanted. What's the bad thing here?

[cluckn@lemmy.world]

Look at Sony’s position. They are still selling the Ps5 despite it having no games.

[abfarid@startrek.website]

Thanks, good to know.

[arcidalex@lemmy.world]

It costs them nothing. Sideloading on iOS is already a thing, they spend more restricting the hell out of it than just letting you do it

[themurphy@lemmy.ml]

In which areas? These news is certinatly not in that direction.