Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Asklemmy
  3. What is the most infuriating "is not a big deal" you have ever heard?

What is the most infuriating "is not a big deal" you have ever heard?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Asklemmy
asklemmy
79 Posts 39 Posters 382 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU [email protected]

    as felt totally dismissed by nearly every adult in my life as a kid

    So at some point it stopped?

    lady_maria@lemmy.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
    lady_maria@lemmy.worldL This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #56

    I wish. lol. no, I just became an adult.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • apotheotic@beehaw.orgA [email protected]

      Pronouns. Especially bad when a 2SLGBTQIA+ person makes out like its not a big deal.

      Its the most simple, base level thing you can do (using correct pronouns for someone etc). Doing it is not a big deal. Its very easy. But if you choose not to, despite how small of a deal it is, then you turn it into a very big deal.

      R This user is from outside of this forum
      R This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #57

      I don’t really care, nor do I see it like a big deal. I’ve done my best in the past, but it’s also easy to say it wrong by accident.

      Also, I don’t have the least idea what 2SLGBTQIA+ means, so I need the person to be clear with me what I should say.

      apotheotic@beehaw.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ultragigagigantic@lemmy.mlU [email protected]

        Capitalism isn't a big deal. As though giving a select few billions won't corrupt the nation around them over time.

        yogthos@lemmy.mlY This user is from outside of this forum
        yogthos@lemmy.mlY This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #58

        And as a corollary, people acting how they just can't imagine how an economy could possibly work if people who do the actual work owned their means of production.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

          Eating meat. It contributes 15-20% of the entire planets greenhouse gasses alone. And people do it just for pleasure. It's mindboggling.

          N This user is from outside of this forum
          N This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #59

          people do it just for pleasure

          there are other reasons, and pretending there aren't won't help youconvince the people who continue to choose it.

          threeduck@aussie.zoneT 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R [email protected]

            I don’t really care, nor do I see it like a big deal. I’ve done my best in the past, but it’s also easy to say it wrong by accident.

            Also, I don’t have the least idea what 2SLGBTQIA+ means, so I need the person to be clear with me what I should say.

            apotheotic@beehaw.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
            apotheotic@beehaw.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #60

            I mean, obviously you can't just magically know someone's pronouns. The point is that you try.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • apotheotic@beehaw.orgA [email protected]

              If you have non-meat alternatives that are within your means and provide the same nutritional value, and you still choose to eat meat on purpose, then it is for pleasure. But if you have a specific circumstance that is preventing you from switching to alternatives, then that's a different story.

              R This user is from outside of this forum
              R This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #61

              I'm not disagreeing with you. My mother has been a vegetarian for decades. She suffers from blood pressure problem and constantly has to go see her doctor. Every time it gets worse she has to eat a small amount of meat to boost her nutritional level, but then she always goes back to being a vegetarian.

              If it's OK for anyone to have a meatless diet, good. If further more he or she does it to save the planet, even better. But not everyone can do so, so I hope those who can do it stop pointing fingers.

              threeduck@aussie.zoneT J 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • N [email protected]

                people do it just for pleasure

                there are other reasons, and pretending there aren't won't help youconvince the people who continue to choose it.

                threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #62

                Can you... Provide some of those reasons?

                N J 2 Replies Last reply
                0
                • R [email protected]

                  I'm not disagreeing with you. My mother has been a vegetarian for decades. She suffers from blood pressure problem and constantly has to go see her doctor. Every time it gets worse she has to eat a small amount of meat to boost her nutritional level, but then she always goes back to being a vegetarian.

                  If it's OK for anyone to have a meatless diet, good. If further more he or she does it to save the planet, even better. But not everyone can do so, so I hope those who can do it stop pointing fingers.

                  threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                  threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #63

                  Why doesn't your mother take a vitamin?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                    Can you... Provide some of those reasons?

                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #64

                    cost, culture, & convenience are the ones I usually refer. gas station hot dogs are cheap and convenient. turning down family recipes put a social strain related to culture. those are two great examples that cover all three. I'm sure you can imagine more: stopping for a fast food burger on your way to protest at the Capitol, etc.

                    threeduck@aussie.zoneT 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N [email protected]

                      cost, culture, & convenience are the ones I usually refer. gas station hot dogs are cheap and convenient. turning down family recipes put a social strain related to culture. those are two great examples that cover all three. I'm sure you can imagine more: stopping for a fast food burger on your way to protest at the Capitol, etc.

                      threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                      threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #65

                      Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                      There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                      I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                      If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                      Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                      N 8 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                        Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                        There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                        I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                        If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                        Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #66

                        Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies.

                        this doesn't change the fact that, for some, in some situations, it is a better source of calories-per-dollar

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                          Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                          There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                          I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                          If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                          Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #67

                          Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things.

                          i think you meant immoral. as it turns out, culture is a great reason to choose amoral actions, and most people think eating meat is amoral.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                            Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                            There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                            I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                            If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                            Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            N This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #68

                            just because it’s easier doesn’t mean it’s right.

                            i didnt say it's right. i said it's a reason people choose meat.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                              Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                              There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                              I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                              If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                              Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              N This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #69

                              stick up for what’s right, don’t crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect

                              most people don't think eating meat is morally wrong.

                              threeduck@aussie.zoneT 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                                Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                                There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                                I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                                If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                                Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #70

                                Plant based food is objectively cheaper

                                sometimes, for some people.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                0
                                • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                                  Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                                  There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                                  I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                                  If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                                  Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  N This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #71

                                  culture doesn’t permit amoral acts

                                  we've been over this.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                                    Meat products are, per kilo, much more costly for their nutrient profiles compared with plant based alternatives. Any time meat is comparable, this is because of government subsidies. There's a reason third world countries rely on plant based foods, because they're objectively cheaper.

                                    There are many cultural practises that we've left in the past. Culture is not an excuse for doing objectively amoral things. I can't say it's my culture to sacrifice children, even if it is.

                                    I'd put convenience under the umbrella of pleasure. If we all lived our life based on convenience, people would drink drive, people wouldn't care about consent, just because it's easier doesn't mean it's right.

                                    If my morality was based on whether it cause friction with my family, what weak morals I would have? "In this house, we say the N word!", "okay yes sorry mum, here I go saying the n word again!" Like, stick up for what's right, don't crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect.

                                    Plant based food is objectively cheaper, culture doesn't permit amoral acts, convenience isn't a valid reason to do wrong, and if mild social pressure from family is enough to cause one to act immoral, then those morals were pretty flimsy to begin with.

                                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                                    N This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #72

                                    convenience isn’t a valid reason to do wrong

                                    we've been over this: most people don't think it's wrong.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • N [email protected]

                                      stick up for what’s right, don’t crumble because it might upset those who are objectively morally incorrect

                                      most people don't think eating meat is morally wrong.

                                      threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      threeduck@aussie.zoneT This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #73

                                      Oh god I didn't even notice I was replying to you.

                                      Gross, you're the worst, most bad faith debater I've ever had the displeasure of talking to.

                                      You don't argue in any sense of data or fact, just shitty little retorts amounting to nothing more than "no, actually".

                                      Don't bother replying, I'm blocking you across all instances until you get an education, maybe when you turn 18 or something.

                                      N 3 Replies Last reply
                                      0
                                      • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                                        Oh god I didn't even notice I was replying to you.

                                        Gross, you're the worst, most bad faith debater I've ever had the displeasure of talking to.

                                        You don't argue in any sense of data or fact, just shitty little retorts amounting to nothing more than "no, actually".

                                        Don't bother replying, I'm blocking you across all instances until you get an education, maybe when you turn 18 or something.

                                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #74

                                        you’re the worst, most bad faith debater I’ve ever had the displeasure of talking to

                                        your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • threeduck@aussie.zoneT [email protected]

                                          Oh god I didn't even notice I was replying to you.

                                          Gross, you're the worst, most bad faith debater I've ever had the displeasure of talking to.

                                          You don't argue in any sense of data or fact, just shitty little retorts amounting to nothing more than "no, actually".

                                          Don't bother replying, I'm blocking you across all instances until you get an education, maybe when you turn 18 or something.

                                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                                          N This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #75

                                          You don’t argue in any sense of data or fact, just shitty little retorts amounting to nothing more than “no, actually”.

                                          there's no data you've presented to discuss

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups