Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for people under age 18
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So you're pretending those bullshit "arguments" you edited into your comment is "you going back to fix your grammar" and not you going back to add stuff?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No, it's not a lie. It's a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there's SEVERAL "edit" labels you've added to the original, which everyone can see.
I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.
You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes later.
You added several sentences. You didn't just "fix typos".
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You weren't talking to me at the time which I was posting to you. How does that make sense to you? That you're "talking to me" before I've posted my first reply to you? How? You can predict the future?
Just stop it man. You're twitching all over the place simply because you're ashamed of having said something stupid. Go off Lemmy and eat something or something. You're tilted.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen. I added all my thoughts immediately. And came back to clarify and fix typos after cause I knew it was a controversial top comment. Especially since it was getting traction immediately.
Congrats on being better technically. Want and award?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You stop it. You're going crazy and writing a novel because you missed some arguments.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
You must read horrible novels if two paragraphs of a few sentences is "a novel." Doesn't speak much to your literacy. Which sort of supports my point about you just being ashamed and not being able to say "whoopsie."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
No. There are 3 edits inadded. Not seventeen.
#No, it’s not a lie. It’s a very clear comical exaggeration for humouristic purposes, because there’s SEVERAL “edit” labels you’ve added to the original, which everyone can see.
Hope you can see that better now than in the previous comment.
I added all my thoughts immediately.
Not before I had already replied to you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Yes, because our conversation is only one single comment you wrote. You definitely haven't been typing way more than me.
I also see you can dish out sarcasm, but you can't take it.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Not where I live it doesn't.
Well they've been sort of soft about it recently because a right-wing government is on the rise.
But basically it's not something that really happens here that much. Some people have even been charged with grievous bodily assault for cultural circumcisions, but I don't think that went through. So basically I think cultural circumcision is currently legal, but not widely spread and has to be done by a medical practitioner, so you can't get a traditional religious practicer to perform the circumcision.
Oh yeah now that I'm reading up about it, some fking company in Finland has seen circumcision as a market gap in like 2016. Pretty much no medical practitioners used to do non-medical circumcisions, but since the muslim population has grown quite a bit and there was some friction about it ~15 years ago https://yle.fi/a/3-5516204 iirc. That's not the only story though.
Anyway, I personally am against any sort of genital mutilation of babies. And trans bottom ops aren't easily done on minors, I can pretty confidently say.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
but you can’t take it.
Am I to interpret this as you thinking you've "got to me"? Sorry to burst your bubble, but that's called "projection". Thanks for letting me know your feelings though.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Idk what to tell you. Maybe you already had the threads loaded. Maybe my client needed an extra minute to update right there. I went back to my comment immediately after to add the edit and edit edit.
Do you want me to be more sketch next time and not even try to add that I edited my comment. Or maybe next tiem I'll add timestamps of when I edit every single word or sentence. But you're taking this way too far.
My original common, which minimally changed to clarify my messups, didn't have anything to do with surgery's, talked about my wanting a bigger dick, and stated people should be able tonexpress how they feel just no life altering drugs.
Even what I added after doesn't change what inworte. Even though I added them immediately
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Keep reaching
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And on that day, not a single citation was given kids .
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I do know what to tell you.
You wrote a comment, I read it, replied it to it, and whilst I was replying to it, you started editing it, then I posted my comment and then you posted your edit.
Nothing weird about it. And still, you don't say you suffered from moobs, do you? So how is me bringing that up me calling you fat just for pointing out that more cis males have gender affirming care than trans people, statistically? You were wrong to say I was calling you fat, because I wasn't. But you can't say "I was mistaken in thinking you called me fat."
"It didn't say anything about surgeries"
You might as well have been talking about pasta in general and then start crying when I bring up spaghetti, saying "I was talking about pasta, it has nothing to do with spaghetti!" One is a subcategory of the other. "Gender affirming care" includes within it gender affirming surgeries.
And how exactly would you go about getting a bigger dick without a surgery, pray tell?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don't give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers
RIP little Timmy, he could have lived with chemo but [email protected] doesn't want children to take drugs.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
So I don't ad life altering drugs one time and you pounce on it? There's obviously a diffrnence between life altering and life saving drugs. Way to take one except out of context.
Gross
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Unfortunately it’s important to prevent the abuse of these surgeries rather than allow all of them.
A child should not be telling their parents they want to mutilate their genitals and vice versa. Some people that need it will lose out but it can always be done later. We don’t need crazy parents allowing these irreversible surgeries on children.
And btw this should INCLUDE circumcision. Circumcision is barbaric
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Except that's not what's happening. They pause puberty with pills so the kid can grow up and make an informed decision after years of therapy. Meanwhile they don't have to worry about their body going the wrong way and contributing to serious mental health problems.
These laws are forcing kids to deal with serious mental illness, not saving them.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Chemo alters life quite a bit, I mean it's pretty much poison.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
None of that is anywhere close to what's happening.
They give them a pill to temporarily block puberty. The point is to keep them from feeling severe mental anguish at their body developing the wrong way while they get years of therapy before a surgery.