Argentina's president bans gender-affirming care for people under age 18

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

I literally went back for Grammer cause I suck at typing.

And why am in not going aback to answer someone calling me out more, cause I'm arguing on like 4 fronts nown

[notsteve_@lemmy.ca]

is it ok to treat non trans kids for gender affirming care

Absolute yes, puberty blockers weren't even invented for trans kids. Early puberty is a thing and a problem that's treated using puberty blockers, the same that a trans person would use.

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

Non edit this time,

Why wouldn't I want to give other access to body modifications even if i myself had those problems. Cause what I really needed was better adults to talk to and more people to tell me everything is fine.

And I know I don't have nearly as many problems as teans kids. And it's in abd faith to compare myself. I was originally trying to point out that I don't agree with giving kids drugs to change thrier lives cause then at what point does it get out of control and it's just blown over.

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

Thats literally not the same thing. CPP can cause actual health problems past wanting to kill yourself.

The drugs in this case it to make suure kid, primarily girls, can grow to their full height and bot have spinal issues due to that, lower cancer rates, and significantly lower the chances of diabetes.

Not thebsame

[dasus@lemmy.world]

So just ignore the timestamps and call me a liar despite knowing you edited the comment and that I answered with a lengthy comment less than 10 minutes after yours had been written, but you still insist I intentionally tried calling you fat?

You just can't admit you were mistaken and apologise?

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

So just ignore that my comment was there and has stayed consistent the whole time. That i.must apologize for going back and fixing errors i made cause inhale bigger fingers. I'm not even going back andcorrextingnanthtungnthis them cause this is how it normally looks befor I gor back.

You made the mistake by changing the argument and don't want to admit yoy pivoted, not me.

[dasus@lemmy.world]

So like, dress and act how you want, but actual genderaffirming care should be left till at least on can have a drink over it first.

Your comment still stands like that.

We're not talking about "body modifications". We are talking about gender affirming care. You may pretend it's "body modification" but like most people have said, all of your rhetoric relies on an asinine view of a kid being able to just go up to their liberal parents and say "I want a complete gender reassignment" and get it, when any trans person goes through tons of psychiatrists and evaluations. They're not given anything that we haven't found to be medically safe. Which is why your "body modifications" of some absurd dick size and bone lengthening at an age where you're still growing wouldn't be accepted by any medical professionals as "gender affirming care."

It's a childish strawman which you use to justify an extremely shitty slippery slope argument. Puberty blockers are safe and effective.

Based on your answers, I assume you must be fervently against circumcision, because that is a literal permanent physical change to one's genitals, and the kid doesn't even have a say in it, much less making the choice for themselves when "they're old enough to have a drink over it." So you oppose allowing circumcision unless it's medically necessary. You also oppose teenage males who get bullied for having tits getting care for that extremely simple problem. That's the only logical conclusion from your rhetoric.

[dasus@lemmy.world]

and has stayed consistent the whole time.

It hasn't. Lie all you want but you had nothing in there about your gender, sex, wants, needs, history, nothing. You simply commented on gender affirming care, then when I pointed out the hypocrisy, you edited it to be literally four times as long.

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

You're absolutely lying now, I did not edit it to kake it longer.

I literally talked about having a bigger dick as one fo my first things I wrote and added on even before posting.

Pure just lying to make yourself seem better

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don't give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

Which since talking to other people I leavened of CPP but that's literally health problems so it's deffrnrt.

But, your making up stuff and trying to mold the arguem t so your right.

Ans lastly cause you wanna add it in, yeah I am against circumcision. But keep changing the argument

[dasus@lemmy.world]

@[email protected]
English-3•

"I made those edits immediately after posting my argument. "

You literally just admitted to having edited the comment a few comments back. Can't even keep your lies straight.

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

You literally don't comprehend stuff, do you? I admitted to going back and fixing my grammar and what not.

Damn your dense.

[dasus@lemmy.world]

Bro my whole arguemt. Since the fuckign beginning has been don’t give kids drugs until we allow adults to have drugs. That includes puberty blockers

So no healthcare for children, got it. No operations for fat boys with moobs, no circumcisions and since you phrase it that way, guess no medication for any other illnesses either, huh? And the reason for this asinine take is the view that you think that children can simply go to a doctors and command them to give them full gender reassignments.

Your ignorance has been the issue the whole time. You're afraid of a problem which doesn't exist and because of that you want to make life miserable for those you pretend you're looking out for. It's horrific, tbh.

"Making up stuff." Name one.

And now you're spamming typos on purpose to even further pretend like you never edited anything to add anything to your comment, despite there being "edit" and "edit edit" and several sentences with those. Who do you think you're lying to?

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

Non edit again for clarity and because you can't go back and reread comments

I added the 'edits' immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

[dasus@lemmy.world]

Edit: this is even more fucked, but like if I hypothetically had a teenage girl and she came up to me and asked for gender affirming care so she could have bigger boobs or whatever I would never let her, but I’m supposed to allow my hypothetical teenage son decide to have boobs?

Edit edit: If my hypothetical teenage son just wants to be the most alpha male he can be, I’m i supposed to just pump him full of testosterone so I’m a good parent?

Oh that's "grammar", is it? I think you don't comprehend the words you use.

[thelasttoot@lemmy.world]

Religion affirming care gets an exception when it comes to mutilating little kids

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

Making stuff up?

you added 17 edits and made your arguemt 600% longer <--Lie
your argument changed completely <-- Lie

And I show you how I normally type cause I got big fingers and toye fast and I get in trouble. I go back to fix errors and get in trouble. There's no winnignwith you

[dasus@lemmy.world]

I added the ‘edits’ immediately after I posted. Went back after starting to argue with you cause I realized I made some grammatical errors cause I went back to reread what I wrote.

You added them 20 minutes later. I replied to you 10 minutes before that.

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

You should have seen the post before I went back ahha

[urpartnerincrime@sh.itjust.works]

Yes, cause you were the only one I was talking to at the time and I didn't reread until coming back to it later.

I don't understand what's so hard to understand