Take out a huge loan
-
As someone who games banks as best I can this would absolutely not work.
Not anymore at least
-
As someone who has travelled and done a lot of random things in my 40 years of life:
Did you take out a huge loan to pay for it?
-
Reminds me of this old story
https://brobible.com/life/article/traveled-to-mexico-to-kill-himself/
A gaggle of chicas
-
Oh so you googled it now? Back down from having heard of people doing it?
Spoiler alert, hasn’t happened! And you haven’t heard of anybody for whom it has! So I stand by my statement.
It’s theoretical nonsense, and credit scores are not the same as creditors, but keep talking nonsense about this “one weird trick” you heard on Facebook!
You’re being unnecessarily aggressive, it’s a common expression that they heard of it on the internet.
They didn’t say they personally knew people who experienced it first hand. So he looked up the specifics when questioned.
-
This post did not contain any content.
i would if I could get a loan.
anyone knows a loanshark? the kind that will kill me if I don't pay back
-
This post did not contain any content.
According to pic, it seems like anon took out 2 huge loans!
-
According to pic, it seems like anon took out 2 huge loans!
Second thing you do after taking a huge loan. First is two chicks at the same time.
-
Wouldn't work, after this you'd love life
Not life with crippling debt.
-
i would if I could get a loan.
anyone knows a loanshark? the kind that will kill me if I don't pay back
Even better- saves you the trouble of having to figure out that last part yourself!
-
take out a business loan under llc
You need to have a feasable business to do that part.
"verticle farming"
-
As someone who has travelled and done a lot of random things in my 40 years of life:
In my 35 years I still regard travel as the best thing one can do with their life but that was when I was outgoing and not depressed so who knows
-
Not life with crippling debt.
You can absolutely travel and have a great time without it being cripplingly expensive, (but yeah you still need a couple thousand dollars)
-
Don't do it OP, traveling and broadening your mind might make you enjoy life and then you'd not be so nonchalant about deleting yourself. You might end up on prison, where you'll suffer doubly due to your newfound love of life and freedom! Better semi-suffer in an empty existence for the rest of your life like most others.
Or like, just stay on a foreign beach with your embezzled money and a drink in your hand and never come back. Actually seems like the best option overall...
Why say "deleting yourself"? Are we really going to censor our speech here too? There's no advertisers to spook by saying killing or committing suicide
-
Why say "deleting yourself"? Are we really going to censor our speech here too? There's no advertisers to spook by saying killing or committing suicide
Why say "deleting yourself"?
That's how I speak and write.
Are we really going to censor our speech here too?
You do you.
There's no advertisers to spook by saying killing or committing suicide
I know, as I've hosted my own Lemmy instance on several occasions. There are a lot of social and networking issues an admin has to consider depending on the content and tone they're willing to accept on their instance but that's besides the point.
The point is that I moderate my speech or of consideration to my fellow human beings and not advertising companies.
-
You can do this, but their response will be to tank your credit. Which makes it hard to get any new loans. Including home loans. Also makes it hard to rent a place, since almost all landlords do a credit check. Hard to get a normal auto loan if you need to buy a car. And iirc, your credit card interest rates will go up.
Take your money to another country. There's no credit check that follows you across borders.
-
Take your money to another country. There's no credit check that follows you across borders.
Right. But banks like their money. Even though I'm not an expert, I assume that they wouldn't let you get away with any significant amount of it without a fight.
-
Why say "deleting yourself"?
That's how I speak and write.
Are we really going to censor our speech here too?
You do you.
There's no advertisers to spook by saying killing or committing suicide
I know, as I've hosted my own Lemmy instance on several occasions. There are a lot of social and networking issues an admin has to consider depending on the content and tone they're willing to accept on their instance but that's besides the point.
The point is that I moderate my speech or of consideration to my fellow human beings and not advertising companies.
Fair enough, I can't argue with that. Language shifts and evolves I suppose, but it still seems problematic to me that the people (not you specifically) change the way they speak to suit an algorithm and not the other way around.
And that's not even mentioning the fact that many people are perfectly alright with using "unalive" and "delete" instead of "kill" or "die" but can't bring themselves to use trans inclusive language, for example. Again, not refering to you with this, you were just the unfortunate person to receive my albeit unwanted rant.
-
Fair enough, I can't argue with that. Language shifts and evolves I suppose, but it still seems problematic to me that the people (not you specifically) change the way they speak to suit an algorithm and not the other way around.
And that's not even mentioning the fact that many people are perfectly alright with using "unalive" and "delete" instead of "kill" or "die" but can't bring themselves to use trans inclusive language, for example. Again, not refering to you with this, you were just the unfortunate person to receive my albeit unwanted rant.
it still seems problematic to me that the people (not you specifically) change the way they speak to suit an algorithm and not the other way around.
Well I actively hacked at the X-Twitter shadowban algo to prove censorship to the point where my account was not only shadowbanned but shadowblocked. Can't even log in to delete my account anymore. But I suppose that's the opposite of what you're describing.
many people are perfectly alright with using “unalive” and “delete” instead of “kill” or “die” but can’t bring themselves to use trans inclusive language
There's an important difference, censorship forces people to adhere to synthetic rules. It's harder to force people to be inclusive or nice.
-
Why say "deleting yourself"?
That's how I speak and write.
Are we really going to censor our speech here too?
You do you.
There's no advertisers to spook by saying killing or committing suicide
I know, as I've hosted my own Lemmy instance on several occasions. There are a lot of social and networking issues an admin has to consider depending on the content and tone they're willing to accept on their instance but that's besides the point.
The point is that I moderate my speech or of consideration to my fellow human beings and not advertising companies.
"consideration to my fellow human beings".
Because your fellow human beings are so profoundly stupid as to not understand that "delete" and "kill" have the same semantic value in that sentence?
If you are going to argue for word replacement it should be for stylistic reasons (rhyming, alliteration, humour, etc), or semantic reasons, as in actually changing the meaning of the statement.
Changing the wording of statement, while retaining the same semantic value, does nothing to reduce offense when the semantic value is what would cause offense.
-
"consideration to my fellow human beings".
Because your fellow human beings are so profoundly stupid as to not understand that "delete" and "kill" have the same semantic value in that sentence?
If you are going to argue for word replacement it should be for stylistic reasons (rhyming, alliteration, humour, etc), or semantic reasons, as in actually changing the meaning of the statement.
Changing the wording of statement, while retaining the same semantic value, does nothing to reduce offense when the semantic value is what would cause offense.
Because your fellow human beings are so profoundly stupid as to not understand that “delete” and “kill” have the same semantic value in that sentence?
No, because people could be traumatized by suicide and get a reaction every time they hear the word. I compare your argument to refusing to stop blasting off crackers around war veterans, it's obviously not gunshots and vets are not stupid enough to mistake them for gunshots.
If you are going to argue for word replacement it should be
No, I argue just the way I like.
Changing the wording of statement, while retaining the same semantic value, does nothing to reduce offense when the semantic value is what would cause offense.
I'm not trying to reduce offense, I'm trying to be considerate. But it seems that's an unknown concept to you. I see no point in communicating with you further, good bye and I wish you a life as nice as you are.
